OdeToCode IC Logo

What a Difference 8 Years Makes (In Code)

Sunday, July 4, 2010

I spent some time this weekend rewriting 8 year old code. It's interesting to compare the pieces where the core logic resides.






Now I'd like to jump ahead 8 years to see the code rewritten again (and bring it back with me).

Gravatar Rob Seder Sunday, July 4, 2010
Perhaps it will include declaring types again and not use "var". Presumably, the future-versions of us will see the folly of this trend and go back to being explicit, once we realize that "assumptions are the root of all software bugs"!! I'm not picking on you, I'm just saying - I don't agree with this trend... :-)
Gravatar Chris Airey Monday, July 5, 2010
Although "var" is not the same as used in dynamic typed languages, eg. JavaScript. I think it really depends on when and where you should use it in C#.
Gravatar Craig Andera Monday, July 5, 2010
That's easy: just write it in Clojure. :)

In short, I couldn't agree with Rob less - the code will be *less* statically typed, not more. Especially something like this...
tobi Monday, July 5, 2010
It seems the two pieces of code are unrelated.
Gravatar scott Monday, July 5, 2010
@Rob - I like var, so we'll have to agree to disagree!

@tobi - Right - it's hard to make a 1:1 screen shot. The original solution used a lot more code and never really expresses the essence of the solution, if you know what I mean.
Gravatar scott Monday, July 5, 2010
@Chris - right!

@Craig - I think this code would look pretty good in Clojure. Hmm ....
Gravatar Tuomas Hietanen Tuesday, July 6, 2010
In 8 years the code will be useless: M$ have already made it for you out-of-the-box. ;)
beyondChairs Wednesday, July 7, 2010
As far as I can tell, neither of these pieces of code is complete, although the first one looks close. The only reasonable comparison is complete correct code A vs complete correct code B
Gravatar scott Wednesday, July 7, 2010
@beyondChairs - That is intentional. If you are looking closely at the code then you are missing the point ... :)
Gravatar James Curran Thursday, July 8, 2010
@scott - I think you're missing the (your) point. To say "I used to do this; now I do this" isn't really meaningful unless the two examples do the same thing.
Gravatar Scott Allen Thursday, July 8, 2010
@James, @beyond - ok, point taken.
HMC Wednesday, July 28, 2010
This is the emperors new clothes and utterly pointless, but hey, who am I to upset your ego ?
Gravatar scott Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Not possible, HMC ;)
Comments are closed.