Configuration Free JSON with WCF and AJAX in Visual Studio 2008 Beta 2

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

With all the out-of-band technology releases we've had (ASP.NET AJAX, .NET 3.0), it's nice to reach a point where we can bring them all together.

As an example...

Create a new web site in Visual Studio 2008. This will have to be a website under IIS, unfortunately, for reasons I'll point out later. Once the web site is up, add a new item – a WCF service. The service contract can look like the following:

public interface IServerProcessInfo
IEnumerable<ProcessInfo> GetRunningProcesses();

The data contract can look like so:

public class ProcessInfo
public string Name { get; set; }

public long WorkingSet { get; set; }

Finally, the LINQish implementation:

public class ServerProcessInfo : IServerProcessInfo
public IEnumerable<ProcessInfo> GetRunningProcesses()
from p in Process.GetProcesses()
orderby p.WorkingSet64 descending
                 select new ProcessInfo
                     Name = p.ProcessName,
                     WorkingSet = p.WorkingSet64

We can entirely remove any WCF <system.serviceModel> configuration from web.config. Instead of all the XML configuration goo, we just need a Factory attribute in our .svc file:

<%@ ServiceHost Language="C#" Debug="true" Service="ServerProcessInfo"
="System.ServiceModel.Activation.WebScriptServiceHostFactory" %>

What magic does this factory give us? Well, we can add a ServiceReference via a ScriptManager (it's nice that AJAX extensions are in the toolbox by default), and write some script:

<asp:ScriptManager ID="ScriptManager1" runat="server">
    <asp:ServiceReference Path="~/ServerProcessInfo.svc" />
<script type="text/javascript">

ws = new;

function getRunningProcessesComplete(result)
for(var i = 0; i < result.length; i++)
" ", result[i].WorkingSet);
"<br />");


Voila! Zero configuration and we have JSON on the wire!

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:08:10 GMT
Content-Length: 662


Note: there is a problem in Beta 2 that prevents this magic from working with WebDev.exe. The error you'll see with WebDev (aka Cassini) is:

"IIS specified authentication schemes 'Ntlm, Anonymous', but the binding only supports specification of exactly one authentication scheme. Valid authentication schemes are Digest, Negotiate, NTLM, Basic, or Anonymous. Change the IIS settings so that only a single authentication scheme is used."

Unfortunately, twiddling with the NTLM checkbox for WebDev doesn't help. Thus, the current need for IIS.

Rick Strahl Tuesday, July 31, 2007
Cool - I haven't had a chance to look at this yet.

Have you tried passing complex values back? The real trick is to find out what can and can't be serialized back from JSON by the service since there were fairly big limitations with PageMethods/ASMX.

One thing that has bugged me about the MS Ajax implementation is that it REQUIRED that the types originated on the server (ie. the JSON had a bunch of .NET specific payload associated with it so it wasn't truly generic.

scott Tuesday, July 31, 2007
Haven't tried anything too complex as yet...
Chris Frazier Thursday, August 2, 2007
There is some batch file that you're supposed to run if you want to work with web sites/webdev.exe. Does this batch file not address this issue? I haven't run it yet, just curious.
Craig Cameron Tuesday, August 7, 2007
Are there any estimates about when VS2008 we will be able to buy VS2008?
gravatar Chris Evans Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Hi Scott,

I realize it's been a while since you wrote this article, but i was wondering if you had decoupled the wcf service and website. When i do it, i (apparently) don't know how to reference the js proxy. I get a Microsoft JScript myservice undefined error.

Nice site btw,

gravatar Scott Allen Wednesday, October 28, 2009

You might try using Fiddler or an HTTP trace tool to see how the web service responds to the /js request that generates a JavaScript proxy. That's probably where I would start.

The biggest problem with decoupling might be cross-domain security issues if "decoupled" means different web server names.

Hope that provides some help,
Comments are closed.

My Pluralsight Courses

K.Scott Allen OdeToCode by K. Scott Allen
What JavaScript Developers Should Know About ECMAScript 2015
The Podcast!