New Microsoft Certifications

Wednesday, October 26, 2005

The curtain is rising on a new set of Microsoft certifications. I’m particularly interested to see how the new exams fare, as I’ve contributed some blood, some sweat, and quite a few tears in contributing content to these exams, as have many others.

The value of a certification is a hotly debated topic. I think you have to examine the subject from two perspectives.

From a personal perspective, I believe the value of a certification is what you make of it. When I studied for my MCSD years ago, I spent time looking at the objectives, then reading books, looking at examples, and most importantly: writing code. When my certificate arrived, I felt I had truly earned something of significance.

Contrast this experience with people I know who work for large consulting firms. Big consulting firms like developers with certifications because they can bill the dev out at a higher hourly rate. The firms will happily send a dev to a one week crash course with a Friday afternoon exam. If the dev already has the skills, you could say this might not be a bad idea, but I’m sure for many people in that scenario, all they earn are pieces of paper with colored ink.

Then there is the other side of the coin. What value do you apply to a certification when you are looking at job candidates? I’d never hire a person just because they have a cert, and I’d never give a thumbs down to someone because they didn’t have a cert. The trick in small companies is to hire people who are passionate about their chosen profession, certification or not.

In any case, software certifications need to continually evolve, improve, and refine themselves, just as software development does. I hope the industry perceives this set of exams as raising the bar – I’ll feel proud.


Comments
Jason Row Wednesday, October 26, 2005
So far I like the name changes. Breaking things down by series (Tech Specialist, Pro Dev, Architect) works for me even though I'll be hard pressed to become an Architect.

I do wish that the exams were more like hands-on labs as that might help reduce the number of people with paper certs.

I always found the Sun Java exams to be more difficult that the MS ones. I found them to be more code intensive and the distractors were well written.
Milan Negovan Wednesday, October 26, 2005
I have a feeling certification is badly overrated. It has a taste of the corporate world where more pieces of flair is considered to be better. :)

I've looked through a couple of sample MCP exams, and thought they were amateurish at times (ironic, eh?) I got a good laugh out of this one: aspnetresources.com/.../sample_70315_question.aspx

Like you, I won't hire anyone simply because they don't have a certificate; neither will I turn anyone down for not having one.
Jun Meng Monday, October 31, 2005
I know some people get certification only to satisfy some simple-minded recruiter's eyes. Otherwise, there is even no chance to get interviewed.
Rajeev Gopal Thursday, December 1, 2005
You are right, Scott. But I do value Certifications as a goal to study! Indeed, it adds to fuel to experiment things. I have never worked on Windows Services or Remoting on a live project, but I do know them just because I studied for the exams.

When you take a cert and tell your boss, he will keep you in mind for an upcoming related project. (It did to me :-)) You cannot tell your boss that "Hey Jim, I completed ASP.NET 2.0 book by SAMS in 2 days! I know ASP.NET".
You can very well say "Hey, guess what Jim, I took MCP for ASP.NET today!"
Comments are now closed.
by K. Scott Allen K.Scott Allen
My Pluralsight Courses
The Podcast!