The Worst of the .NET 1.x Years

Wednesday, March 23, 2005

It’s been a wild ride for the last 5 years. We’ve seen the best - what about the worst?

1)Visual Basic.NET

The problem isn’t with the language – VB is a great language, and I’m not formulating my “best and worst lists” based on technology virtues alone, but on the “experience”.

The controversy over Visual Basic.NET started before the product’s release date. Then came the salary surveys, the misinformation, disinformation, statistics, lies, videotapes, benchmarks, whining, moaning, and gnashing of teeth.

The debate over the merits of this language seem to be in an infinite loop.

Bill Vaughn is right: Microsoft should have named the new language B#. Same language – different name – it would be a success story.

2)Managed C++

Being a former C++ __type myself, I investigated the __new managed __extensions. __For some __reason I could __never __warm __up to the __syntax. I hear^ there are^ some changes^ in store^ for 2005.

3) Tight Coupling of Visual Studio to IIS

With an ASP.NET project, have you ever…
had the wwwroot$ share disappear?
wrestled with front page server extensions?
seen an entire folder disappear?
tried to put the project under source control?
tricked Visual Studio into thinking the project isn’t really a web project?
built the project with an automated build engine? No - no - without Nant!
debugged as non-admin?
been unable to open a web project?
seen a ‘web access failed’ error message?
had a problem moving a web project from one computer to the other?
created a web application without admin privs?

This too shall pass in 2.0

4) IDisposable

If I had a dime for every time the intricacies of IDisposable were explained in newsgroups, mailing lists, conference halls, chat rooms, bathrooms, and blogs – I’d buy myself a Formula One race car, and drive it 6 days a week on my own private racetrack.

Then to find out there is special case reference counting in the framework...

5) Smart Clients

Despite all the hype – smart clients seem to have gained very little traction in the 1.x timeframe. Smart clients are once again poised to take the world by storm with Click-Once deployment in 2.0. Where has the love been for the HREF EXE? Do you think we can write an application like World Wind with AJAX?

The above opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of anyone else I know.


Comments
thomas woelfer Wednesday, March 23, 2005
Scott,
<br>
<br>how about
<br>
<br>- vs locking dlls every so often.
<br>- vs crashing when debugging solutions that mix managed and native code
<br>- forms editor garbling code, deleting code every so often
<br>- vs loosing intellisense all of the time.
<br>
<br>and all of this without a service pack. for more than 2 years.
<br>
<br>WM_MY0.02$
<br>thomas woelfer
<br>
<br>
Scott Wednesday, March 23, 2005
Ah, yes. Some of those you just get to used after two year, Thomas ;)
Milan Negovan Wednesday, March 23, 2005
I think Visual Studio.NET itself can be placed in both &quot;good&quot; and &quot;bad&quot; categories. It's a great tool, but also a horrible one for everyday use. So much arm twisting...
Etienne Labonte Thursday, March 24, 2005
ASP.NET databinding syntax mixed up with control tags is bad enough. Sometimes this also breaks designer support and produces invalid HTML.
Frans Bouma Thursday, March 24, 2005
How about:
<br>- dissapearing event handler setup in code behind pages?
<br>- removed controls from winforms because vs.net thought that would be great, after 20 minutes of setting everything up!
<br>- mangled HTML source because you had to switch to design view and back
<br>- failing intellisense in properties in C#
<br>- after crafting nice databinding code in your asp.net page like &lt;a href=&quot;&lt;%#... #%&gt;&quot;&gt;..&lt;/a&gt; you wanted to switch to design view and you found out that the designer couldn't handle databinding tags in quoted strings!
<br>
<br>
Mike Gale Tuesday, March 29, 2005
Visual Studio is waaay too slow for small jobs.
<br>
<br>If you write ASP.NET and are using decent markup / techniques (XHTML, CSS...) yu've got to throw the design surface away and roll your own too often.
<br>
<br>The two browser levels of ASP.NET is a horrible design. We need something we can configure, extend and keep up to date ourselves.
Comments are now closed.
by K. Scott Allen K.Scott Allen
My Pluralsight Courses
The Podcast!