Team $ystem

Wednesday, March 23, 2005

Don’t you just love when those brash, young h4xxorz in the newsgroups type Microsoft with a $ sign? Such a rebellious nature….

It’s interesting to watch the reaction to the obfuscated pricing announcement for VS 2005 Team System (a readable version, with opinion, is presented by Mike Gunderloy).

Is Team System expensive?

Expensive is a relative term, isn’t it?

Is CaliberRM expensive? Is Rational Rose Enterprise expensive? Is ClearCase or Perforce expensive? Have you ever priced just their yearly support contracts for an enterprise?

I don’t think the price is surprising given the above list, but I was hoping Team Foundation Server would be where Microsoft tried to make  money back. The server seems reasonably priced, but Visual Studio and MSDN subscriptions are handing out sticker shock – particularly to independent consultants who pay for subs out of their own pocket.

MSDN subscribers are accustomed to having the fully loaded IDE, but it doesn't look like this will come with an easily justifiable price anymore.


Comments
Michael Giagnocavo Friday, March 25, 2005
Yep... crazy prices. I guess 'cause it's an Enterprise system, ya' know?
<br>
<br>Meh. Because small devs obviously don't need good solid source control or defect management. Of course not. A corrupting source control system is good enough for them. Sigh.
Scott Friday, March 25, 2005
I'm wondering now - why not take the SourceGear approach and let anyone use Team Foundation Server in single user mode? At least it would make consultants / authors / evaluators happy.
<br>
<br>The IDE price though - wow.
Comments are now closed.
by K. Scott Allen K.Scott Allen
My Pluralsight Courses
The Podcast!